Sustainability in business is no longer an option, it is an imperative that makes sound business and moral sense. It must permeate every aspect of a business and inform the way it thinks, behaves, strategises and operates. This will ensure it optimises returns for its shareholders over the long term, while remaining a relevant business for its staff, clients, suppliers and the communities in which it operates.
Nedbank Group recognises this reality and the impact it has, not just on the realisation of its long-term vision, but also on the day-to-day actions it takes.
The group also recognises that the only effective approach to sustainability is one in which sustainable practices and philosophies are at the core of every aspect of the organisation – impacting positively on people, philosophies, economics, the environment and the country as a whole.
For this reason Nedbank Group’s approach to sustainability is a holistic and integrated one that brings together economic, environmental, social and cultural elements to ensure that sustainability is inextricably woven into the fabric of the organisation and enables it to realise its vision of becoming a leader in sustainability.
SUSTAINABILITY TARGETS: 2010 AND 2011
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY |
| 2010 target | Status | Performance | 2011 target |
| Minimising our environmental footprint |
Achieved | Reduction efforts continued during 2010, with good progress being made against the electricity, travel and overall carbon reduction targets. Paper reduction targets were not met. (See commentary on page 106 for details.) The group remains committed to reducing its carbon emissions further and achieving the target of 12% emissions reduction by 2015, from its 2007 baseline. | Continued carbon reduction, with the overall target being emissions reduction of 12% by 2015, from its 2007 baseline. |
| Achieving carbon neutrality | Achieved | By offsetting its 2009 carbon footprint (of approximately 213 000 tonnes) Nedbank Group was the first financial services company in Africa to achieve carbon neutrality. Importantly, this was via a ‘reduce first and offset only where necessary’ approach. Please refer to the carbon neutrality case study on page 104 for details of the process and resulting benefits for the group and its stakeholders. | Maintaining carbon neutrality. |
| Increased focus on water efficiency | Achieved | The group’s 2010 water intensity reduction target of 5% per fulltime employee (FTE) from the 2005 baseline was met at the end of 2009. As such, a new target of reducing water usage by 10% per FTE (from 2009 levels) by the end of 2011 has been set. As part of the ongoing water reduction commitment the group has undertaken a number of focused water reduction initiatives (see page 106 for further details). | Continued focus on water efficiency. |
| Centralised electronic carbon database | Not achieved | The group set out to develop a centralised electronic carbon database to improve the accuracy of the reporting and monitoring of natural resources usage and carbon emissions. Complications in terms of integrating the various data flows from across the organisation meant that this objective was not achieved in 2010. It remains a high priority for 2011. | Centralised electronic carbon database. |
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY |
| 2010 target | Status | Performance | 2011 target |
| Remaining a level 2 Department of Trade and Industry (dti) contributor | Achieved | Nedbank Group has been able to strengthen its position by scoring a total of 89,50%. Employment equity and skills development, however, remain under pressure, as natural staff attrition has slowed. Preferential procurement is an area of strength with the overall group |
To maintain level 2 contributor status with improving scores. |
| Beyond compliance – enhancing access for all to financial services |
Mostly achieved | While this is not a requirement under the dti Codes, Nedbank Group remains committed to providing ready access to financial services as part of its vision of becoming a bank for all South Africans. The recovery from the financial crisis and availability of suitable land for property development are some of the factors that inhibited delivery of all internal targets. Despite this, its efforts have gone a long way to furthering access to financial services. Please refer to the ‘Non-scoring performance’ section of the scorecard on page 94. | Continue to enhance access for all to financial services. |
| Empowerment financing | Achieved | Despite the challenging economic backdrop, and this target not forming part of the dti Codes, the group has continued to focus on empowerment and transformation financing as a means of realising its commitment to corporate development in South Africa. Please refer to the ‘Non-scoring performance’ section of the scorecard on page 94. | Continue to grow our involvement in financing. |
| Voting rights | Economic interest | Designated groups |
Employee schemes/ broad-based schemes, etc |
Net equity value |
Total score | Weighting | |||
| Ownership | Black people |
Black women |
Black people |
Black women |
|||||
| 30,71% | 3,25% | 28,05% | 3,84% | 10,84% | 12,26% | 30,71% | 20,11% | 20% | |
| Management | Black board |
Black executive directors |
Black senior top management* |
Black top other management |
Black independent directors |
Total score | Weighting |
| 47,06% | 41,67% | 25,00% | n/a | 50,00% | 8,62% | 10% |
| Employment equity | Black senior management |
Black middle management |
Black junior management |
Black disabled as % of total |
Total score | Weighting |
| 26,15% | 50,85% | 72,40% | 1,15% | 11,42% | 15% |
| Skills development | Black skills spend | Black disabled skills spend | Category b, c, d black learners |
Total score | Weighting |
| 2,78% | 0,04% | 3,02% | 9,60% | 15% |
| Preferential procurement |
% spend | % spend on QSEs1 and EMEs2 |
% spend on blackowned |
% spend on BWO | Total score | Weighting |
| 85,12% | 27,13% | 12,56% | 5,24% | 19,75% | 20% |
| Enterprise development |
Contributions | Total score | Weighting |
| 6,98% | 15,00% | 15% |
| Socioeconomic development |
Contributions | Total score | Weighting |
| 1,46% | 5,00% | 5% |
| Product/Area | Mzanzi (accounts) |
FSC4 (branches) |
Black SMMEs5 (R million) |
Black agriculture (R million) |
Affordable housing (R million) |
Trans- formational infrastructure (R million) |
BEE6 transaction financing (R million) |
Consumer education (% of retail NPAT7) |
Weighting |
| Achieved | 315 024 | 8 | R1 772 | R70 | R2 099 | R5 681 | R6 570 | 0,27% | |
| Growth vs 2009 | (0,72%) | 0,00% | 52,54% | 71,43% | 63,84% | 59,18% | 79,27% | (7,4%) |
| Total BEE score | dti level 2 | 89,50% | 100% |
* Nedbank does not distinguish between senior top and other top management and has elected to measure top management as a single indicator as prescribed by paragraph 4.4 of Code Series 200 of the dti Codes.
1 Qualifying small entities.
2 Exempt microenterprises.
3 Black-women-owned.
4 Financial Sector Charter.
5 Small, medium and microenterprises.
6 Black economic empowerment.
7 Net profit after tax.
SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES AND POLICY FRAMEWORK |
| SUSTAINABILITY FOCUS AREAS |
Nedbank Group strategic focus, Deep Green aspirations* and material issues |
Relevant risks | Board and executive committee risk management committees |
Policies and forums |
Guiding principles |
| ECONOMIC | Strategic focus
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Green aspirations
|
|||||
Key material issue
|
|||||
| ENVIRONMENTAL | Strategic focus
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Green aspirations
|
|||||
Key material issue
|
|||||
| SOCIAL | Strategic focus
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Green aspirations
|
|||||
Key material issue
|
|||||
| CULTURAL | Strategic focus
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Green aspirations
|
|||||
Key material issue
|
Note: In addition, all relevant legislation is complied with.
| HEADLINE EARNINGS | DILUTED HEADLINE EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE | NON-INTEREST REVENUE | |||
![]() |
![]() |
| This page was updated on 4 April, 2011 |