| NEDBANK CAPITAL PROVIDES SPECIALIST ADVICE, DEBT AND EQUITY RAISING AND EXECUTION, AND TRADING CAPABILITIES TO CLIENTS IN ALL MAJOR SA BUSINESS SECTORS. CLIENTS INCLUDE THE TOP 200 DOMESTIC CORPORATES, PARASTATALS, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, MULTINATIONAL CORPORATES AND MAJOR INFRASTRUCUTRE AND MINING PROJECTS IN AFRICA AS WELL AS EMERGING BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CONSORTIUMS. |
|||||||
|
The cluster comprises three primary businesses, from which it makes its distinctive
products, services and solutions available to its clients. These are: INVESTMENT BANKING, which includes:
|
||||||
GLOBAL MARKETS, which includes:
TREASURY This is Nedbank Group’s funding interface with local and international financial and investment markets. All domestic and foreign currency-funding requirements are satisfied and managed through this unit. Treasury also includes the Carbon Finance Unit and offers structured financial solutions. THE YEAR UNDER REVIEWWhile the SA equity markets enjoyed a marginal recovery in 2010 - assisted to a certain degree by the successful 2010 FIFA World Cup - this did not translate into any notable increase in corporate activity for the period under review. A benign interest rate environment and relatively low levels of volatility also meant fewer opportunities for clients to avail themselves of Nedbank Capital’s products and solutions.Credit extension was muted as corporates predominantly focused inwards, placing greater emphasis on prudent business management in order to ride out the difficult economic period. The business environment has also become far more competitive, both locally and internationally, with global organisations increasing their local presence and many local businesses extending their product offerings in preparation for an eventual economic upturn. The challenging economic environment limited the need for clients to raise capital due to a generally compressed credit extension environment. As a result, while Nedbank Capital’s main asset generating businesses added R9 billion in new advances, repayments of a similar amount occurred. The Global Markets business also experienced difficult trading conditions, which impacted negatively on foreign exchange volumes and margins. A general lack of volatility in fixed-income and interest rate markets also had an adverse effect on revenue Given the uncertain economic outlook, as well as reduced earnings in some of Nedbank Capital’s private equity investments, the business adopted a conservative approach in the mark-to-market valuation of its portfolio. This resulted in higher impairment levels. The cluster’s equity businesses were supported by a moderate recovery in the equity markets, resulting in an impressive turnaround from the loss-making position of 2009. Despite this challenging environment, Nedbank Capital retained its strong position in the local finance market, as evidenced by the many awards it garnered during the year under review, the most significant of which were:
The fifth annual Nedbank Capital Green Mining Awards took place in 2010. Nedbank Capital instituted these awards in 2005 to acknowledge and celebrate the invaluable contribution that responsible mining and mineral beneficiation make to the economic development of Africa (see the Sustainability Development Performance section of this report, for more information). Innovation and client service remain key to Nedbank Capital’s sustainable-business model. Every deal is structured around the creation of innovative solutions, delivered from a base of understanding and full service support. While most of the deals are tailored to specific client needs, this innovative thinking also led to the development and launch of a number of off-the-shelf products during the year under review – many of which will serve as a useful foundation for structuring individual deals in the future. ![]() Nedbank Capital continues to review all potential finance transactions for environmental and social compliance with International Finance Corporation (IFC) performance standards and legislation. An integrated and proactive approach to current and future legislation and standards is followed, while strictly complying with the Equator Principles – a set of guidelines drawn up in 2003 by the IFC in conjunction with 10 of the world’s largest banks with a view to ensuring a consistent approach to managing environmental and social risks in project financing. To embed the principles of responsible investing further, the origination and credit teams underwent compliance training in 2010 to increase their awareness and understanding of social and environmental risks and their influence on the sustainability of the book. Nedbank Group was the first African bank to adopt the Equator Principles in November 2005 and applies these to all project finance transactions exceeding US$10 million. The Equator Principles risk categories are broadly as follows:
NEDBANK CAPITAL EQUATOR PRINCIPLES PROJECT FINANCE TRANSACTIONS 2005 – 2010
All project finance transactions that are impacted by the Equator Principles must comply with the guidelines, as well as World Bank and IFC performance standards and environmental health and safety guidelines. Every project finance application is assessed and categorised in terms of its potential environmental and social impacts, using the IFC performance standard as a benchmark. Prospective borrowers are required to abide by the standard and, once finance is approved, all potential environmental impacts are closely monitored to ensure ongoing compliance. Borrowers undertake to comply with specific obligations related to their high- or medium-risk projects. An IFC prerequisite for any reporting of Equator Principles-linked transactions is that the first drawdown must occur in the financial year being reported on. In this regard the only project finance transaction by Nedbank Capital that was subject to the Equator Principles (as its first drawdown was in 2010) was an energy transaction situated in Ghana that is categorised as a B (medium risk). The Nedbank Capital value of the deal is US$25 million.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equator Principles transactions are typically complex with material lead times
to implementation. The figures above only reflect transactions drawn in the
respective years and not total approvals for those years.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nedbank Capital’s ROE remained strong in the 2010 financial year
at 23,5%. Headline earnings decreased by 17,2% to R1 202 million
(2009: R1 452 million) for the first time in six successive years.
Economic profit of R477 million declined 42,7% as a result of higher
capital allocation and increased cost of equity. Capital allocation
increased from R4 678 million to R5 116 million as the group
realigned economic and regulatory capital utilisation. The operating environment continued to be challenging, with corporate and project demand for credit remaining muted. Average banking advances grew by 6,2% and average deposits by 16,4%, boosted by negotiable certificates of deposit and fixed-rate notes as institutional clients sought higher-yield, longer-dated instruments. The cluster remains a strong generator of non-interest revenue (NIR) as evidenced by the continued improvement in the NIR-to-expenses ratio from an already high ratio of 139,2% to 145,0%. Trading income showed strong growth of 14,8%, primarily due to a significant improvement in the equity trading business. The forex business experienced margin compression and lack of volatility compared with 2009. Income from the advisory business and private equity decreased as a result of subdued levels of advisory activity and difficult markets respectively. Nedbank Capital impairments increased to R535 million due to a conservative approach to mark-to-market valuation adjustments in the private equity portfolio. This largely contributed to a 12,7% decrease in operating income to R2 930 million for the 2010 financial period. Total expenses declined by 2,8% to R1 561 million, which can be attributed to tight cost control. This is also reflected in the efficiency ratio improving to 45,1%, compared with 45,9% in 2009, despite the cluster investing for growth in a number of systems to improve trading. |